The new heroine of the YouTube show Ksenia Sobchak is actress Agata Muceniece, who recently became a victim of domestic violence. We will remind, the excitement on the network caused a video recorded by Agata, in which she admitted that her husband, actor Pavel Priluchny, drinks 10 days in a row, and also kicks her and the children out of the house.
Later, Muceniece published on her blog a poem dedicated to her husband, in which she confessed her love to him and asked to forgive her. In a conversation with Sobchak, Agata explained that the video was recorded on emotions, and later she thought that perhaps it was not worth washing dirty linen in public. However, she clarified that she apologized not for her words, but for the fact that they lost their family and could not keep love.
Nevertheless, it was the problem of domestic violence and family relations that became the main topic of the conversation between Ksenia and Agatha. Collected the most interesting quotes in our material.
On the fact of violence by Pavel Priluchny
There are many ways to raise your hand, but this video wouldn’t exist if there was no reason to shoot it. In Russia, there is a very strange concept of domestic violence. It seems to me that only in Russia there is such an expression “beats means loves.” Our women often come up with excuses for their beloved men.
I did not come up with an excuse, but I really love this person, and I see that the person is confused, some kind of mistake. Our parting now will give him a moment of self-awareness. And I think this is good.
Agata Muceniece and Ksenia Sobchak
About relations with Pavel Priluchny
We always had a passionate relationship, we always threw dishes, threw plates at each other. This line is difficult to feel when someone crosses it. Our relationship was initially super emotional and it was even fun.
We could break a rented apartment, then fix it together. We felt so good. But it’s understandable that no matter how you fight, the man is still stronger.
Pavel Priluchny and Agata Muceniece
On the acquittal of Pavel Priluchny
I love this person, I do not want in any way to show him in some bad light. I really asked for help, and it seemed to me that this video is my only savior. It annoys me more that in our country it is difficult to punish a person for domestic violence. We believe that women exaggerate, think that all this is not worth attention.
Sobchak clarified why Agatha herself is currently trying to practically hush up the situation.
Well, how could it be otherwise? Destroy a person? You see that the person is lost, that he has such a bad period. I cannot be a teacher for him. We agreed that I was the perfect victim and he was the perfect criminal. This worked for a while, it doesn’t work now.
About family life
It seemed to me that this is the beauty of love, when you give yourself to your family from your super goals, you give yourself to the birth of a child, you are ready to spoil your body in order to give birth to a child for a man. This is what fairy tales put into our heads. I don’t want to discount it – it was a great time, great. It is unlikely that I will go on such a journey with any other man,
– Sobchak commented on Muceniece’s question, is Agatha belittling herself too much, comparing herself to “a button from a shirt” and “a handle from a mug” (the actress used such epithets in one of the poems dedicated to parting with Priluchny).
The most important thing in divorce is to remain good parents if you have children. Stay friends, make sure that the children do not feel everything that is happening.
Agatha also noted that she and her children left Pavel on the same day she recorded the video. And she has not yet discussed what happened with her son Timofey and daughter Mia in detail, saying that while she and dad will live separately. According to her, when everything happened, the children were in the house, but they did not see the conflict between her and Pavel with their own eyes. Muceniece also added that Timofey is very attached to the pope and asked Agatha not to quarrel with him.
The actress also noted that, although due to the presence of children and property, the court is inevitable, they have already agreed on everything, while the country house in which they lived together will remain for Pavel (Agatha herself has now moved to a city apartment).
I am not the kind of person who will divide the property for money. Even if he said: “I will take everything”, I would say: “Well, okay”,
– added Agatha.
The actress also admitted that now the decision to divorce was mutual, although earlier Priluchny threw such phrases just during a quarrel.
Let’s clarify that today in the publication Peopletalk a message appeared that the marriage of Agatha and Pavel was officially terminated, as the actress herself reported, without mutual claims. Muceniece remained a Mercedes GL car and a 4-room apartment in Moscow worth 28 million rubles. In an interview with Sobchak, Agata also clarified that the cost of the country house, which remained behind Pavel, is about two million dollars.
On equality in the family
This is never a priori impossible. Anyway, there will always be someone in front. Who earns more, you or Konstantin (Bogomolov. – Ed.)?
– Agatha asked Sobchak.
Ksenia admitted that she earns more, but her husband provides for himself and in general “he is not about money, but about creativity.” In addition, according to Sobchak, who is in charge is not decided by money. This should be an agreement between partners within the family.
Well, this balance can work for seven years, and in the eighth, for example, someone starts to distort. But in general, it seems to me that people should not live their whole life with the same person,
– Agatha noted.
On the personal life of Pavel Priluchny
I don’t know, I don’t watch his story, I’m blocked by him. We communicate only as parents, I talked to him today. Our task is to prevent our relationship from affecting the little ones now.
About the strongest offense
It was a big job for me to become a “mug handle”. I really broke myself to be with my husband. And it seemed to me that this should be appreciated. And when it was not appreciated, then this, of course, is my biggest offense.
About role models of man and woman
Probably, nature is not stupid, and she made men physically stronger, but morally weaker. Therefore, men and women must create the perfect balance. That is, a man is physically stronger, a woman supports him morally. And now the two of them live happily ever after. So maybe it’s not worth changing the institution of women, but giving a man confidence?
About Regina Todorenko
I will not be her judge. If she said so, well she said. I didn’t call her and didn’t even comment on all this. It seems to me that this is not a lesson for her, but for all of us. First, watch your words, and secondly, we see that the crowd is the worst thing that can happen to a person. The crowd can carry a person in their arms and the next moment they throw him and start throwing stones.
Agatha also noted that Regina herself called her and apologized for her words.
I wanted to hug her. Whatever it is, but this situation is not worth it. I think this is too cruel, Regina is hardly such a wicked woman. She clearly didn’t want that. I wanted to support her. Personally, I don’t hold a grudge against her.
Agatha also explained from her point of view why hate fell on Regina, and Marat Basharov’s public confessions of beating his wives remain without consequences.
Our Internet space is ruled by women. Women tend to be the most violent. Marat a priori, it seems to me, did not carry any image of correctness.
About movement #MeToo
This is the question that we like to exaggerate. When this happens, this is one thing, but when every third person starts doing things twenty years ago, they remember when it starts to take the form of manipulation from the female side and absurdity: oh, he looked at my ass … Now any attention from a man can be regarded as an insult …
To be honest, I am not very deeply aware of feminism, so I will not even pretend to be smart and reason. Feminism is some kind of struggle for women’s rights. But again, it is very controversial, which is why I do not delve into it. There are some positions that I support, there are some positions that I do not understand. It seems to me that nature nevertheless created physically two different creatures – a man and a woman.
And only together these two creatures can get one more person. And this is the logic of primitiveness. People still have a breeding program. And in this we must look for the essence and truth.
Yes, I know that actors get more than actresses. But I know that finding the main character – a man is three times more difficult than a woman. There are many women, they are all beautiful, and the choice is in the palm of your hand. And finding the main character – a man – is a whole disaster. Supply and demand influence this, not sex characteristics,
– Agatha noted when Sobchak clarified that feminism is about the struggle for equal opportunities and rights.
Muceniece also noted that she does not understand why women are fighting for the right to engage in professions that are currently prohibited for them, because “they will perform them worse than men.”